# AIR-Bench-Chat ## Overview AIR-Bench Chat is the generative half of [AIR-Bench](https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.07729) (Audio InstRuction Benchmark, ACL 2024 main conference) — the first instruction-following benchmark for large audio-language models (LALMs), covering **human speech, natural sounds and music**. It contains roughly 2k open-ended audio QA pairs covering speech, sound, music and mixed-audio scenes; responses are graded by a GPT-4 judge against a reference answer. ## Task Description - **Task Type**: Open-ended audio question answering. - **Input**: An audio clip plus a free-form question. - **Output**: A textual answer evaluated against the reference response. - **Modalities**: Audio (human speech, natural sounds, music) + text. ## Key Features - ~2k open-ended audio QA pairs across speech, sound, music and mixed-audio scenes; the generative half of AIR-Bench (ACL 2024). - 8 Chat tasks aggregated by the official `cal_score.py` into 5 reported categories: `speech` (`speech_QA`, `speech_dialogue_QA`), `sound` (`sound_QA`, `sound_generation_QA`), `music` (`music_QA`, `music_generation_analysis_QA`), `speech_and_sound` (`speech_and_sound_QA`), `speech_and_music` (`speech_and_music_QA`). The paper's Mixed-audio = mean(speech_and_sound, speech_and_music). - Position bias is removed by judging every sample twice with reference/prediction order swapped, then averaging (disable via `extra_params={'do_swap': False}` to halve judge cost). - Hosted on ModelScope ([`evalscope/AIR-Bench-Dataset`](https://modelscope.cn/datasets/evalscope/AIR-Bench-Dataset)) in an audiofolder + JSON layout; the full release is ~49 GB, so limit tasks via `extra_params={'tasks': [...]}` for partial runs. ## Evaluation Notes - Metrics: `judge_score` is the model's mean judge score; `win_rate` records how often the model strictly beats the reference. - The judge LLM receives the question, the textual audio description (`meta_info`), the reference answer (`answer_gt`), and the model's response, and outputs two integer scores in `[1, 10]`. Use a judge that supports long contexts, since `meta_info` may exceed 4k tokens for dialogue tasks. - The official leaderboard uses `gpt-4-0125-preview`. If that exact snapshot is unavailable, use an available GPT-4-class judge; absolute scores can drift versus the published numbers because the judge model changed. - If the dataset is already on disk, pass `dataset_args={'air_bench_chat': {'local_path': '/path/to/AIR-Bench-Dataset'}}`; the local root should contain `Chat/`. ## Properties | Property | Value | |----------|-------| | **Benchmark Name** | `air_bench_chat` | | **Dataset ID** | [evalscope/AIR-Bench](https://modelscope.cn/datasets/evalscope/AIR-Bench/summary) | | **Paper** | [Paper](https://aclanthology.org/2024.acl-long.109/) | | **Tags** | `Audio`, `InstructionFollowing`, `QA` | | **Metrics** | `judge_score`, `win_rate` | | **Default Shots** | 0-shot | | **Evaluation Split** | `test` | ## Data Statistics | Metric | Value | |--------|-------| | Total Samples | 2,200 | | Prompt Length (Mean) | 83.89 chars | | Prompt Length (Min/Max) | 17 / 423 chars | **Per-Subset Statistics:** | Subset | Samples | Prompt Mean | Prompt Min | Prompt Max | |--------|---------|-------------|------------|------------| | `speech_QA` | 400 | 64.33 | 23 | 148 | | `speech_dialogue_QA` | 400 | 77.03 | 29 | 206 | | `sound_QA` | 400 | 73.29 | 17 | 166 | | `sound_generation_QA` | 100 | 222.52 | 130 | 423 | | `music_QA` | 400 | 57.54 | 24 | 202 | | `music_generation_analysis_QA` | 100 | 267.52 | 148 | 395 | | `speech_and_sound_QA` | 200 | 63.98 | 25 | 127 | | `speech_and_music_QA` | 200 | 69.37 | 32 | 127 | **Audio Statistics:** | Metric | Value | |--------|-------| | Total Audio Files | 2,200 | | Audio per Sample | min: 1, max: 1, mean: 1 | | Formats | mp3, wav | ## Sample Example **Subset**: `speech_QA` ```json { "input": [ { "id": "5781ee73", "content": [ { "audio": "/root/.cache/modelscope/hub/datasets/evalscope/AIR-Bench-Dataset/Chat/speech_QA_iemocap/Ses01F_script01_1_M025.wav", "format": "wav" }, { "text": "Who is the speaker addressing at the end of the speech?" } ] } ], "target": "The speaker is addressing Mom at the end of the speech.", "id": 0, "group_id": 0, "subset_key": "speech_QA", "metadata": { "uniq_id": 400, "task_name": "speech_QA", "dataset_name": "iemocap", "category": "speech", "meta_info": "{'emotion': 'neutral', 'gender': 'male', 'transcription': \"And then we'll thrash it out with father. Okay Mom? Don't avoid me.\"}", "question": "Who is the speaker addressing at the end of the speech?" } } ``` ## Prompt Template **Prompt Template:** ```text {question} ``` ## Extra Parameters | Parameter | Type | Default | Description | |-----------|------|---------|-------------| | `tasks` | `list` | `None` | Optional list of Chat task names to evaluate (subset of ['music_QA', 'music_generation_analysis_QA', 'sound_QA', 'sound_generation_QA', 'speech_QA', 'speech_and_music_QA', 'speech_and_sound_QA', 'speech_dialogue_QA']). Defaults to all tasks. | | `do_swap` | `bool` | `True` | When True (default), each sample is judged twice with the order of reference vs. prediction swapped, then scores are averaged. Disable to halve judge cost at the price of position bias. | ## Usage ### Using CLI ```bash evalscope eval \ --model YOUR_MODEL \ --api-url OPENAI_API_COMPAT_URL \ --api-key EMPTY_TOKEN \ --datasets air_bench_chat \ --limit 10 # Remove this line for formal evaluation ``` ### Using Python ```python from evalscope import run_task from evalscope.config import TaskConfig task_cfg = TaskConfig( model='YOUR_MODEL', api_url='OPENAI_API_COMPAT_URL', api_key='EMPTY_TOKEN', datasets=['air_bench_chat'], dataset_args={ 'air_bench_chat': { # subset_list: ['speech_QA', 'speech_dialogue_QA', 'sound_QA'] # optional, evaluate specific subsets # extra_params: {} # uses default extra parameters } }, limit=10, # Remove this line for formal evaluation ) run_task(task_cfg=task_cfg) ```