# 👍 Contribute Benchmark EvalScope, as the official evaluation tool of [ModelScope](https://modelscope.cn), is continuously optimizing its benchmark evaluation features! We invite you to refer to this tutorial to easily add your own benchmark and share your contributions with the community. Let's work together to enhance EvalScope and make our tool even better! Below, we will introduce how to add two types of benchmark evaluations: **General Text Reasoning** and **Multiple Choice**, which mainly include three steps: uploading the dataset, registering the dataset, and writing the evaluation task. ## Basic Concepts ```{tip} You can skip this section and start directly from [Preparing Benchmark Evaluation Dataset](#1-preparing-benchmark-evaluation-dataset). Refer back to the specific implementation when encountering code you don't understand. ``` The evaluation process of EvalScope mainly includes the following steps: 1. **Data Preparation**: Load and preprocess the dataset through `DataAdapter`. 2. **Task Definition**: Define the configuration of the evaluation task through `TaskConfig`, including models, datasets, evaluation metrics, etc. 3. **Evaluation Execution**: Execute the evaluation task through the `run_task` function and output the evaluation results. Among them, `DataAdapter` is the core component of benchmark evaluation that we need to focus on. ### DataAdapter Architecture and Call Flow DataAdapter adopts a Pipeline architecture, supporting custom behavior through hook methods. Taking `DefaultDataAdapter` as an example, the complete evaluation process is as follows: ``` 1. Data Loading Phase load_dataset() ├── load() │ ├── load_from_remote() / load_from_disk() │ │ ├── load_subsets() │ │ │ └── load_subset() / load_fewshot_subset() │ │ │ └── record_to_sample() [User Implementation] │ │ └── _post_process_samples() │ │ └── process_sample_input() │ │ ├── sample_to_fewshot() [User Implementation] │ │ ├── format_fewshot_template() [Optional User Implementation] │ │ └── format_prompt_template() [Optional User Implementation] │ └── Returns DatasetDict 2. Model Inference Phase (Per Sample) run_inference() ├── _on_inference_start() [Hook Method] ├── _on_inference() [Hook Method] └── _on_inference_end() [Hook Method] └── Returns TaskState 3. Metric Calculation Phase (Per Sample) calculate_metrics() ├── filter_prediction() │ └── extract_answer() [Optional User Implementation] ├── match_score() / llm_match_score() └── Returns SampleScore 4. Result Aggregation Phase aggregate_scores() └── Returns List[AggScore] 5. Report Generation Phase generate_report() ├── _on_generate_report() [Hook Method] └── _on_generate_report_end() [Hook Method] └── Returns Report ``` ### Core Data Structures #### 1. Sample Object Represents a single evaluation sample, including input, target answer, and metadata: ```python @dataclass class Sample: input: Any # Input content (question text or list of chat messages) target: str # Target answer (correct answer) choices: Optional[List[str]] = None # Choices (used for multiple choice questions) subset_key: Optional[str] = None # Subset division key (used for grouping by category) metadata: Optional[Dict] = None # Metadata (reasoning process, ID, etc.) tools: Optional[List] = None # Tool call information ``` #### 2. TaskState Object Represents the complete state of a single inference task: ```python @dataclass class TaskState: model: str # Model name sample: Sample # Input sample messages: List[ChatMessage] # Chat message history output: ModelOutput # Model raw output completed: bool # Whether the task is completed sample_id: Optional[str] = None # Sample ID group_id: Optional[str] = None # Group ID metadata: Optional[Dict] = None # Task metadata ``` #### 3. ModelOutput Object Represents the raw output of the model: ```python @dataclass class ModelOutput: completion: str # Text generated by the model message: ChatMessage # Formatted chat message # Other model-specific fields... ``` #### 4. Score Object Represents the scoring result of a single sample: ```python @dataclass class Score: value: Dict[str, float] # Scores for each metric {"acc": 1.0, "f1": 0.8} extracted_prediction: str # Extracted prediction answer prediction: str # Raw prediction text metadata: Dict = None # Scoring metadata ``` #### 5. SampleScore Object Encapsulates the complete scoring information of a single sample: ```python @dataclass class SampleScore: score: Score # Scoring object sample_id: Optional[str] # Unique identifier for the sample group_id: Optional[str] # Group identifier sample_metadata: Optional[Dict] = None # Sample metadata ``` #### 6. AggScore Object Represents aggregated scoring statistics: ```python @dataclass class AggScore: metric: str # Metric name value: float # Aggregated value (e.g., average score) subset: str # Subset name num_samples: int # Number of samples agg_method: str # Aggregation method (mean, median, etc.) metadata: Dict = None # Aggregation metadata ``` #### 7. DatasetDict Object Manages multiple dataset subsets: ```python class DatasetDict(dict): """Dataset dictionary, keys are subset names, values are Dataset objects""" @classmethod def from_dataset(cls, dataset, subset_list=None, limit=None, repeats=1): """Create a multi-subset dataset dictionary from a single dataset""" pass ``` ### Core Methods of DataAdapter Based on the above call flow, here are the key methods that need to be implemented by the user or can be optionally overridden: #### Methods That Must Be Implemented 1. **`record_to_sample(record: Dict[str, Any]) -> Sample`** - **Purpose**: Convert raw data records into standard Sample objects - **Input**: Raw record dictionary from the dataset - **Output**: Standardized Sample object - **Example**: ```python def record_to_sample(self, record: Dict[str, Any]) -> Sample: return Sample( input=record['question'], target=record['answer'], metadata={'reasoning': record.get('explanation', '')} ) ``` #### Methods That Can Be Optionally Implemented 2. **`sample_to_fewshot(sample: Sample) -> str`** - **Purpose**: Convert sample into a few-shot example string - **Input**: Sample object - **Output**: Formatted few-shot example text - **Call Timing**: When constructing few-shot prompts 3. **`extract_answer(prediction: str, task_state: TaskState) -> str`** - **Purpose**: Extract the final answer from the model's raw output - **Input**: Model prediction text and task state - **Output**: Extracted answer string - **Call Timing**: Before calculating metrics for answer cleaning 4. **`format_prompt_template(sample: Sample) -> str`** - **Purpose**: Format the basic prompt template - **Input**: Sample object - **Output**: Formatted prompt text - **Default Implementation**: Uses `prompt_template.format(question=sample.input)` 5. **`format_fewshot_template(fewshot: str, sample: Sample) -> str`** - **Purpose**: Format the prompt template containing few-shot examples - **Input**: Few-shot example string and Sample object - **Output**: Complete few-shot prompt - **Default Implementation**: Uses `few_shot_prompt_template.format()` 6. **`sample_filter(sample: Sample) -> bool`** - **Purpose**: Filter dataset samples - **Input**: Sample object - **Output**: Whether to retain the sample - **Default Implementation**: Returns True (retains all samples) ### Hook Method System DataAdapter provides a hook method system, supporting custom logic insertion at key points: #### Inference Phase Hooks - **`_on_inference_start(model, sample)`**: Before inference starts - **`_on_inference(model, sample)`**: Execute inference - **`_on_inference_end(model, sample, model_output, output_dir)`**: After inference ends #### Report Generation Hooks - **`_on_generate_report(scores, model_name)`**: Generate report - **`_on_generate_report_end(report, output_dir)`**: After report generation ### Adapter Types EvalScope provides two main adapter base classes: 1. **`DefaultDataAdapter`**: Basic adapter for general text reasoning tasks - Suitable for open-ended question answering, mathematical reasoning, code generation, etc. - Requires custom answer extraction logic 2. **`MultiChoiceAdapter`**: Specialized adapter for multiple choice tasks - Inherits from `DefaultDataAdapter` - Built-in choice formatting and answer extraction logic - Supports single-choice and multiple-choice modes Principles for choosing adapter types: - If the task involves selecting answers from fixed options → Use `MultiChoiceAdapter` - If the task requires generating open-ended answers → Use `DefaultDataAdapter` ## 1. Preparing Benchmark Evaluation Dataset You have two ways to prepare the benchmark evaluation dataset: 1. **Upload to ModelScope (Recommended)**: Upload the dataset to the ModelScope platform, so other users can easily load your dataset, making it more convenient to use and benefiting more users from your contribution. If you need to upload to ModelScope, refer to the [Dataset Upload Tutorial](https://www.modelscope.cn/docs/datasets/create). 2. **Local Use**: You can also directly use the local dataset for evaluation, suitable for datasets that are still in development or contain sensitive information. Regardless of the method chosen, ensure that the data format is correct and can be loaded. If using a local dataset, you can test with the following code: ```python from modelscope import MsDataset dataset = MsDataset.load("/path/to/your/dataset") # Replace with your dataset ``` ## 2. Creating File Structure First, [Fork EvalScope](https://github.com/modelscope/evalscope/fork) repository, i.e., create your own EvalScope repository copy, and clone it locally. ```bash git clone https://github.com/your_username/evalscope.git cd evalscope ``` Then, add benchmark evaluation in the `evalscope/benchmarks/` directory, with the structure as follows: ```text evalscope/benchmarks/ ├── benchmark_name │ ├── __init__.py │ ├── benchmark_name_adapter.py │ └── ... ``` Specifically for `GSM8K` and `MMLU-Pro`, the structure is as follows: ```text evalscope/benchmarks/ ├── gsm8k │ ├── __init__.py │ ├── gsm8k_adapter.py ├── mmlu_pro │ ├── __init__.py │ ├── mmlu_pro_adapter.py │ └── ... ``` ## 3. Writing Evaluation Logic Below, we will take **GSM8K** and **MMLU-Pro** as examples to introduce two types of evaluation tasks: **General Text Reasoning** and **Multiple Choice**. ### General Text Reasoning General text reasoning tasks usually require the model to analyze and reason about the given problem and then generate an answer. Taking GSM8K (mathematical reasoning) as an example: We need to register `Benchmark` and implement the `GSM8KAdapter` class in `gsm8k_adapter.py`: ```python from typing import Any, Dict from evalscope.api.benchmark import BenchmarkMeta, DefaultDataAdapter from evalscope.api.dataset import Sample from evalscope.api.evaluator import TaskState from evalscope.api.registry import register_benchmark from evalscope.constants import Tags # Define prompt template PROMPT_TEMPLATE = """ Solve the following math problem step by step. The last line of your response should be of the form "ANSWER: $ANSWER" (without quotes) where $ANSWER is the answer to the problem. {question} Remember to put your answer on its own line at the end in the form "ANSWER: $ANSWER" (without quotes) where $ANSWER is the answer to the problem, and you do not need to use a \\boxed command. Reasoning: """.lstrip() # Register benchmark evaluation @register_benchmark( BenchmarkMeta( name='gsm8k', # Benchmark test name pretty_name='GSM8K', # Readable name dataset_id='AI-ModelScope/gsm8k', # Dataset ID or local path tags=[Tags.MATH, Tags.REASONING], # Tags description='GSM8K (Grade School Math 8K) is a dataset of grade school math problems, designed to evaluate the mathematical reasoning abilities of AI models.', subset_list=['main'], # Subset list few_shot_num=4, # Few-shot example number train_split='train', # Training set split name eval_split='test', # Evaluation set split name metric_list=['acc'], # Evaluation metrics prompt_template=PROMPT_TEMPLATE, # Prompt template ) ) class GSM8KAdapter(DefaultDataAdapter): def record_to_sample(self, record: Dict[str, Any]) -> Sample: """Convert raw data records into Sample objects""" DELIM = '####' question = record['question'] answer = record['answer'].split(DELIM) target = answer.pop().strip() # Extract final answer reasoning = DELIM.join(answer) # Extract reasoning process return Sample( input=question, target=target, metadata={'reasoning': reasoning.strip()} ) def sample_to_fewshot(self, sample: Sample) -> str: """Convert sample into few-shot example""" if sample.metadata: return ( f'{sample.input}\n\nReasoning:\n' + f"{sample.metadata['reasoning']}\n\n" + f'ANSWER: {sample.target}' ) else: return '' def extract_answer(self, prediction: str, task_state: TaskState): """Extract answer from model prediction""" from evalscope.filters.extraction import RegexFilter # Use regular expression to extract numeric answer regex = RegexFilter(regex_pattern=r'(-?[0-9.,]{2,})|(-?[0-9]+)', group_select=-1) res = regex(prediction) return res.replace(',', '').replace('+', '').strip().strip('.') ``` ### Multiple Choice Multiple choice tasks require the model to select the correct answer from given options. Taking MMLU-Pro as an example, we need to inherit `MultiChoiceAdapter`: ```python from typing import Any, Dict from evalscope.api.benchmark import BenchmarkMeta, MultiChoiceAdapter from evalscope.api.dataset import Sample from evalscope.api.registry import register_benchmark from evalscope.constants import Tags # Define prompt template USER_PROMPT_TEMPLATE = """Answer the following multiple choice question. The last line of your response should be of the following format: 'ANSWER: $LETTER' (without quotes) where LETTER is one of {letters}. Think step by step before answering. Question: {question} Options: {choices} """.lstrip() SUBSET_LIST = [ 'computer science', 'math', 'chemistry', 'engineering', 'law', 'biology', 'health', 'physics', 'business', 'philosophy', 'economics', 'other', 'psychology', 'history' ] @register_benchmark( BenchmarkMeta( name='mmlu_pro', pretty_name='MMLU-Pro', tags=[Tags.MULTIPLE_CHOICE, Tags.KNOWLEDGE], description='MMLU-Pro is a benchmark for evaluating language models on multiple-choice questions across various subjects.', dataset_id='modelscope/MMLU-Pro', subset_list=SUBSET_LIST, metric_list=['acc'], few_shot_num=5, train_split='validation', eval_split='test', prompt_template=USER_PROMPT_TEMPLATE, ) ) class MMLUProAdapter(MultiChoiceAdapter): def __init__(self, **kwargs): super().__init__(**kwargs) self.reformat_subset = True # Enable subset division def record_to_sample(self, record: Dict[str, Any]) -> Sample: """Convert raw data records into Sample objects""" return Sample( input=record['question'], choices=record['options'], # Choice list target=record['answer'], # Correct answer (e.g., 'A') subset_key=record['category'].lower(), # Key for subset division metadata={ 'cot_content': record['cot_content'], 'subject': record['category'].lower(), 'question_id': record['question_id'], }, ) def sample_to_fewshot(self, sample: Sample) -> str: """Convert sample into few-shot example""" q_str = f"""Question:\n{str(sample.input)}""" options = sample.choices if sample.choices is not None else [] # Format choices opt_str_list = [] for i, opt in enumerate(options): opt_str_list.append(f"""{chr(65 + i)} {opt}""") opt_str = f"""Options:\n{'\n'.join(opt_str_list)}""" # Handle answer and reasoning process ans_str = sample.metadata['cot_content'] if sample.metadata is not None else '' ans_str = ans_str.replace('The answer is', 'ANSWER:') ans_opt = ans_str.split('ANSWER:')[-1].split('.')[0].strip().strip('(').strip(')') ans_str = ans_str.replace(f'ANSWER: ({ans_opt})', f'ANSWER: {ans_opt}') final_str = '\n'.join([q_str, opt_str, ans_str]) return final_str ``` ### Key Differences Explanation **General Text Reasoning** vs **Multiple Choice**: 1. **Inherited Base Class**: - General Text Reasoning: Inherits `DefaultDataAdapter` - Multiple Choice: Inherits `MultiChoiceAdapter` 2. **Sample Object Structure**: - General Text Reasoning: Mainly includes `input` and `target` - Multiple Choice: Additionally includes `choices` (choice list) 3. **Answer Extraction Method**: - General Text Reasoning: Requires custom `extract_answer()` method - Multiple Choice: `MultiChoiceAdapter` provides standard answer extraction logic 4. **Prompt Template**: - General Text Reasoning: Focuses more on guiding the reasoning process - Multiple Choice: Focuses on displaying choices and answer format ## 4. Running Evaluation Debug the code to see if it can run normally. **GSM8K Example**: ```python from evalscope import run_task, TaskConfig task_cfg = TaskConfig( model='Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct', datasets=['gsm8k'], limit=10, debug=True ) run_task(task_cfg=task_cfg) ``` **MMLU-Pro Example**: ```python from evalscope import run_task, TaskConfig task_cfg = TaskConfig( model='Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct', datasets=['mmlu_pro'], limit=10, dataset_args={'mmlu_pro': {'subset_list': ['computer science', 'math']}}, debug=True ) run_task(task_cfg=task_cfg) ``` Output Example: ```text +-----------------------+-----------+-----------------+------------------+-------+---------+---------+ | Model | Dataset | Metric | Subset | Num | Score | Cat.0 | +=======================+===========+=================+==================+=======+=========+=========+ | Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct | gsm8k | mean_acc | main | 10 | 0.3 | default | +-----------------------+-----------+-----------------+------------------+-------+---------+---------+ | Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct | mmlu_pro | mean_acc | computer science | 10 | 0.1 | default | +-----------------------+-----------+-----------------+------------------+-------+---------+---------+ | Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct | mmlu_pro | mean_acc | math | 10 | 0.1 | default | +-----------------------+-----------+-----------------+------------------+-------+---------+---------+ ``` ## 5. Benchmark Evaluation Document Generation After completing the benchmark evaluation implementation, you can use the tools provided by EvalScope to generate standard documents. This will ensure that your benchmark evaluation has a consistent document format and can be easily understood and used by other users. To generate Chinese and English documents, run the following command, which will generate documents based on registration information: ```bash pip install -e '.[docs]' make docs ``` ## 6. Submitting PR After completing the implementation of these methods and document generation, your benchmark evaluation is ready! You can submit a [PR](https://github.com/modelscope/evalscope/pulls). Before submitting, please run the following command, which will automatically format the code: ```bash make lint ``` Ensure there are no formatting issues, and we will merge your contribution as soon as possible, allowing more users to use the benchmark evaluation you contributed. If you don't know how to submit a PR, you can check our [Guide](https://github.com/modelscope/evalscope/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md). Give it a try 🚀