# EQ-Bench ## Overview EQ-Bench is a benchmark for evaluating language models on emotional intelligence tasks. It assesses the ability to predict likely emotional responses of characters in dialogues by rating the intensity of possible emotional reactions. ## Task Description - **Task Type**: Emotional Intelligence Assessment - **Input**: Dialogue scenario with characters - **Output**: Emotion intensity ratings in specific format - **Domains**: Emotional understanding, social cognition ## Key Features - Tests ability to predict emotional responses in conversations - Requires rating intensity of multiple possible emotions - Uses official EQ-Bench v2 scoring algorithm - Scoring includes sigmoid scaling for small differences - Adjustment constant ensures random answers score 0 ## Evaluation Notes - Default evaluation uses the **validation** split - Primary metric: **EQ-Bench Score** (0-100 scale, reported as 0-1) - Uses zero-shot evaluation (no few-shot examples) - Responses must include emotion ratings in specific JSON-like format - Official algorithm from [Paper](https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.06281) | [Homepage](https://eqbench.com/) ## Properties | Property | Value | |----------|-------| | **Benchmark Name** | `eq_bench` | | **Dataset ID** | [evalscope/EQ-Bench](https://modelscope.cn/datasets/evalscope/EQ-Bench/summary) | | **Paper** | N/A | | **Tags** | `InstructionFollowing` | | **Metrics** | `eq_bench_score` | | **Default Shots** | 0-shot | | **Evaluation Split** | `validation` | ## Data Statistics | Metric | Value | |--------|-------| | Total Samples | 171 | | Prompt Length (Mean) | 1550.02 chars | | Prompt Length (Min/Max) | 922 / 3737 chars | ## Sample Example **Subset**: `default` ```json { "input": [ { "id": "97129bc9", "content": "Your task is to predict the likely emotional responses of a character in this dialogue:\n\nRobert: Claudia, you've always been the idealist. But let's be practical for once, shall we?\nClaudia: Practicality, according to you, means bulldozing ev ... [TRUNCATED] ... ary:\n\nRemorseful: \nIndifferent: \nAffectionate: \nAnnoyed: \n\n\n[End of answer]\n\nRemember: zero is a valid score, meaning they are likely not feeling that emotion. You must score at least one emotion > 0.\n\nYour answer:" } ], "target": "{'emotion1': 'Remorseful', 'emotion2': 'Indifferent', 'emotion3': 'Affectionate', 'emotion4': 'Annoyed', 'emotion1_score': 2, 'emotion2_score': 3, 'emotion3_score': 0, 'emotion4_score': 5}", "id": 0, "group_id": 0, "metadata": { "reference_answer": { "emotion1": "Remorseful", "emotion2": "Indifferent", "emotion3": "Affectionate", "emotion4": "Annoyed", "emotion1_score": 2, "emotion2_score": 3, "emotion3_score": 0, "emotion4_score": 5 }, "reference_answer_fullscale": { "emotion1": "Remorseful", "emotion2": "Indifferent", "emotion3": "Affectionate", "emotion4": "Annoyed", "emotion1_score": 0, "emotion2_score": "6", "emotion3_score": 0, "emotion4_score": "7" } } } ``` *Note: Some content was truncated for display.* ## Prompt Template **Prompt Template:** ```text {question} ``` ## Usage ### Using CLI ```bash evalscope eval \ --model YOUR_MODEL \ --api-url OPENAI_API_COMPAT_URL \ --api-key EMPTY_TOKEN \ --datasets eq_bench \ --limit 10 # Remove this line for formal evaluation ``` ### Using Python ```python from evalscope import run_task from evalscope.config import TaskConfig task_cfg = TaskConfig( model='YOUR_MODEL', api_url='OPENAI_API_COMPAT_URL', api_key='EMPTY_TOKEN', datasets=['eq_bench'], limit=10, # Remove this line for formal evaluation ) run_task(task_cfg=task_cfg) ```