evalstone/evalscope/tests/perf/test_openai_api_parse_responses.py
2026-07-08 08:57:50 +00:00

128 lines
4.3 KiB
Python

"""Unit tests for ``OpenaiPlugin.parse_responses``.
These cover the behavior of the usage-block parsing branch, including
the cases where an OpenAI-compatible endpoint returns a partial usage
block (e.g. Vertex AI's Gemini 2.5 reasoning mode omits
``completion_tokens`` from ``usage`` when ``max_tokens`` is reached
with only reasoning tokens emitted).
"""
import pytest
from evalscope.perf.arguments import Arguments
from evalscope.perf.plugin.api.openai_api import OpenaiPlugin
@pytest.fixture
def plugin():
"""Return an ``OpenaiPlugin`` instance with no tokenizer configured.
Using ``tokenizer_path=None`` lets us assert that the usage-block
branch returns directly when ``prompt_tokens`` or
``completion_tokens`` is present, without falling through to the
content-based tokenization path (which would raise ``ValueError``
because no tokenizer is available).
"""
args = Arguments(model='test-model', api='openai', number=1, parallel=1)
return OpenaiPlugin(args)
def test_parse_responses_full_usage(plugin):
"""Standard case: both prompt_tokens and completion_tokens present."""
responses = [{'usage': {'prompt_tokens': 100, 'completion_tokens': 50}}]
assert plugin.parse_responses(responses) == (100, 50)
def test_parse_responses_missing_completion_tokens(plugin):
"""Vertex Gemini 2.5 reasoning-mode shape: completion_tokens omitted.
Before this fix, ``KeyError`` on the missing key was caught by the
broad ``except`` and the parser returned ``(0, 0)``, silently
discarding the valid ``prompt_tokens``.
"""
responses = [{
'choices': [{
'finish_reason': 'length',
'index': 0
}],
'usage': {
'prompt_tokens': 7180,
'total_tokens': 7193,
'completion_tokens_details': {
'reasoning_tokens': 13
},
},
}]
assert plugin.parse_responses(responses) == (7180, 0)
def test_parse_responses_missing_prompt_tokens(plugin):
"""Symmetric case: only ``completion_tokens`` is present."""
responses = [{'usage': {'completion_tokens': 25}}]
assert plugin.parse_responses(responses) == (0, 25)
def test_parse_responses_null_completion_tokens(plugin):
"""``completion_tokens: null`` is treated the same as missing."""
responses = [{'usage': {'prompt_tokens': 42, 'completion_tokens': None}}]
assert plugin.parse_responses(responses) == (42, 0)
def test_parse_responses_explicit_zero_tokens(plugin):
"""Explicit ``0`` values are returned, not treated as missing.
Falling through to content-based tokenization here would raise
``ValueError`` when no tokenizer is configured. The
``'prompt_tokens' in usage or 'completion_tokens' in usage`` check
guarantees we honor explicit zeros and avoid the fall-through.
"""
responses = [{'usage': {'prompt_tokens': 0, 'completion_tokens': 0}}]
assert plugin.parse_responses(responses) == (0, 0)
def test_parse_responses_empty_response_list(plugin):
"""An empty response list returns ``(0, 0)`` (unchanged behavior)."""
assert plugin.parse_responses([]) == (0, 0)
def test_parse_responses_stream_last_chunk_usage(plugin):
"""Streaming case: only the final chunk carries the usage block."""
responses = [
{
'choices': [{
'delta': {
'content': 'hello'
}
}]
},
{
'choices': [{
'delta': {
'content': ' world'
}
}]
},
{
'choices': [{
'finish_reason': 'stop'
}],
'usage': {
'prompt_tokens': 8,
'completion_tokens': 2
},
},
]
assert plugin.parse_responses(responses) == (8, 2)
def test_parse_responses_usage_present_but_empty_falls_through(plugin):
"""An empty usage block (``{}``) should fall through to content parsing.
With no tokenizer configured and no parseable content, the
content-based path raises ``ValueError`` — verifying that the
usage-branch did NOT swallow this case and return ``(0, 0)`` (which
would mask a missing-tokenizer misconfiguration).
"""
responses = [{'usage': {}}]
with pytest.raises(ValueError):
plugin.parse_responses(responses, request='{}')