3.7 KiB
3.7 KiB
HaluEval
Overview
HaluEval is a large collection of generated and human-annotated hallucinated samples for evaluating the performance of LLMs in recognizing hallucination. It provides a comprehensive benchmark for assessing model reliability and factual accuracy.
Task Description
- Task Type: Hallucination Detection
- Input: Context/knowledge + response to judge
- Output: YES (hallucination) or NO (factual)
- Domains: Dialogue, QA, Summarization
Key Features
- Three evaluation categories:
dialogue_samples: Hallucination in conversational responsesqa_samples: Hallucination in question answeringsummarization_samples: Hallucination in document summaries
- Both generated and human-annotated samples
- Tests model's ability to detect factual inconsistencies
- Requires reasoning about knowledge-response alignment
Evaluation Notes
- Default evaluation uses zero-shot (no few-shot examples)
- Multiple metrics computed:
- Accuracy: Overall correct judgments
- Precision: True positives among positive predictions
- Recall: True positives among actual positives
- F1 Score: Harmonic mean of precision and recall
- Yes Ratio: Proportion of YES predictions
- Binary YES/NO judgment format
Properties
| Property | Value |
|---|---|
| Benchmark Name | halueval |
| Dataset ID | evalscope/HaluEval |
| Paper | N/A |
| Tags | Hallucination, Knowledge, Yes/No |
| Metrics | accuracy, precision, recall, f1_score, yes_ratio |
| Default Shots | 0-shot |
| Evaluation Split | data |
Data Statistics
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Total Samples | 30,000 |
| Prompt Length (Mean) | 4832.18 chars |
| Prompt Length (Min/Max) | 2463 / 16078 chars |
Per-Subset Statistics:
| Subset | Samples | Prompt Mean | Prompt Min | Prompt Max |
|---|---|---|---|---|
dialogue_samples |
10,000 | 3563.69 | 3169 | 4200 |
qa_samples |
10,000 | 2811.83 | 2463 | 4004 |
summarization_samples |
10,000 | 8121.02 | 4932 | 16078 |
Sample Example
Subset: dialogue_samples
{
"input": [
{
"id": "a99406f3",
"content": [
{
"text": "I want you act as a response judge. Given a dialogue history and a response, your objective is to determine if the provided response contains non-factual or hallucinated information. You SHOULD give your judgement based on the following hallu ... [TRUNCATED] ... do! Robert Downey Jr. is a favorite. [Human]: Yes i like him too did you know he also was in Zodiac a crime fiction film. \n#Response#: I'm not a fan of crime movies, but I did know that RDJ starred in Zodiac with Tom Hanks.\n#Your Judgement#:"
}
]
}
],
"target": "YES",
"id": 0,
"group_id": 0,
"metadata": {
"answer": "yes"
}
}
Note: Some content was truncated for display.
Prompt Template
Prompt Template:
{question}
Usage
Using CLI
evalscope eval \
--model YOUR_MODEL \
--api-url OPENAI_API_COMPAT_URL \
--api-key EMPTY_TOKEN \
--datasets halueval \
--limit 10 # Remove this line for formal evaluation
Using Python
from evalscope import run_task
from evalscope.config import TaskConfig
task_cfg = TaskConfig(
model='YOUR_MODEL',
api_url='OPENAI_API_COMPAT_URL',
api_key='EMPTY_TOKEN',
datasets=['halueval'],
dataset_args={
'halueval': {
# subset_list: ['dialogue_samples', 'qa_samples', 'summarization_samples'] # optional, evaluate specific subsets
}
},
limit=10, # Remove this line for formal evaluation
)
run_task(task_cfg=task_cfg)