4.4 KiB
4.4 KiB
TIR-Bench
Overview
TIR-Bench (Thinking-with-Images Reasoning Benchmark) is a comprehensive multimodal benchmark that evaluates agentic visual reasoning capabilities of vision-language models. It covers diverse task categories requiring spatial, compositional, and multi-step visual reasoning.
Task Description
- Task Type: Multi-task Visual Reasoning (MCQ, OCR, word search, spot difference, jigsaw, etc.)
- Input: One or two images + question (most tasks use multiple-choice format)
- Output: Answer letter (MCQ) or numeric/text response depending on task type
- Domains: instrument, color, refcoco, rotation_game, math, word_search, visual_search, ocr, symbolic, spot_difference, contrast, jigsaw, maze
Key Features
- 1,215 test samples across 13 diverse visual reasoning task categories
- Covers single-image and dual-image reasoning scenarios
- Answers span letter choices (A-J), integers, floats, and text
- Task-specific scoring with LLM-as-judge fallback for robust evaluation
Evaluation Notes
- Default evaluation uses the test split (1,215 samples)
- Primary metric: Accuracy (acc)
- Images are downloaded as
data.zipfrom ModelScope and extracted automatically - Rule-based scoring: OCR (substring match), jigsaw (grid IoU), spot_difference (set IoU), word_search (numeric match), all other tasks (MCQ / numeric judge)
- Recommended: set
judge_strategy=JudgeStrategy.LLM_RECALLand providejudge_model_argsto activate LLM-as-judge as a recall mechanism — the judge is called only when rule-based scoring gives 0, providing more accurate evaluation without unnecessary API overhead - Paper | GitHub
Properties
| Property | Value |
|---|---|
| Benchmark Name | tir_bench |
| Dataset ID | evalscope/TIR-Bench |
| Paper | Paper |
| Tags | MultiModal, QA, Reasoning |
| Metrics | acc |
| Default Shots | 0-shot |
| Evaluation Split | test |
Data Statistics
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Total Samples | 1,215 |
| Prompt Length (Mean) | 384.97 chars |
| Prompt Length (Min/Max) | 19 / 4039 chars |
Per-Subset Statistics:
| Subset | Samples | Prompt Mean | Prompt Min | Prompt Max |
|---|---|---|---|---|
instrument |
80 | 110.96 | 57 | 196 |
color |
100 | 130.26 | 98 | 241 |
refcoco |
120 | 144.51 | 132 | 182 |
rotation_game |
75 | 146.44 | 140 | 148 |
math |
120 | 126.69 | 50 | 397 |
word_search |
100 | 126.72 | 24 | 307 |
visual_search |
120 | 111.64 | 19 | 501 |
ocr |
60 | 35.08 | 29 | 116 |
symbolic |
50 | 88.18 | 66 | 243 |
spot_difference |
100 | 1114.79 | 93 | 1379 |
contrast |
50 | 48.1 | 31 | 123 |
jigsaw |
120 | 605 | 605 | 605 |
maze |
120 | 1527.06 | 626 | 4039 |
Image Statistics:
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Total Images | 1,255 |
| Images per Sample | min: 1, max: 2, mean: 1.03 |
| Resolution Range | 60x23 - 6944x9280 |
| Formats | jpeg, mpo, png, webp |
Sample Example
Subset: instrument
{
"input": [
{
"id": "dd25f10d",
"content": [
{
"image": "[BASE64_IMAGE: jpg, ~2.9MB]"
},
{
"text": "According to the image, what is the thermometer reading in Fahrenheit? Answer as an integer like 1,2,3."
}
]
}
],
"target": "72",
"id": 0,
"group_id": 0,
"subset_key": "instrument",
"metadata": {
"task": "instrument",
"meta_data": {},
"id": 6
}
}
Prompt Template
No prompt template defined.
Usage
Using CLI
evalscope eval \
--model YOUR_MODEL \
--api-url OPENAI_API_COMPAT_URL \
--api-key EMPTY_TOKEN \
--datasets tir_bench \
--limit 10 # Remove this line for formal evaluation
Using Python
from evalscope import run_task
from evalscope.config import TaskConfig
task_cfg = TaskConfig(
model='YOUR_MODEL',
api_url='OPENAI_API_COMPAT_URL',
api_key='EMPTY_TOKEN',
datasets=['tir_bench'],
dataset_args={
'tir_bench': {
# subset_list: ['instrument', 'color', 'refcoco'] # optional, evaluate specific subsets
}
},
limit=10, # Remove this line for formal evaluation
)
run_task(task_cfg=task_cfg)